drivers/block/drbd

DRBD distributed replicated block device

DRBD (Distributed Replicated Block Device) mirrors block devices in real time between two or more Linux servers over the network, effectively acting as RAID-1 across machines. It is widely used as the storage layer for high-availability clusters and failover databases, and has been maintained by LINBIT since the early 2000s.

keep conf=0.90 deploy=medium replacement=none subsystem=block category=storage-block
90%

recommendation

It should stay because DRBD is not legacy hardware support but a live, actively developed replication subsystem. LINBIT is still shipping DRBD 9.x releases and posting substantial upstream rework as recently as 2026, and no in-tree alternative covers the same synchronous block-replication role for HA clusters and software-defined storage.

repository signals

27 files
29,384 source lines
136 commits, 5y
+1,557 / −1,781 lines added / removed, 5y
52 authors, 5y
monthly commits · 2021-04-21 → 2026-04-21 · 136 total · active in 40/61 months
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-04: 0 commits · +0 −0 2021-05: 1 commit · +8 −15 2021-06: 1 commit · +6 −16 2021-07: 0 commits · +0 −0 2021-08: 2 commits · +3 −4 2021-09: 1 commit · +5 −1 2021-10: 2 commits · +3 −5 2021-11: 3 commits · +10 −7 2021-12: 0 commits · +0 −0 2022-01: 4 commits · +13 −32 2022-02: 3 commits · +18 −149 2022-03: 6 commits · +40 −28 2022-04: 18 commits · +161 −173 2022-05: 0 commits · +0 −0 2022-06: 2 commits · +44 −9 2022-07: 4 commits · +27 −29 2022-08: 1 commit · +1 −1 2022-09: 4 commits · +2 −8 2022-10: 3 commits · +10 −12 2022-11: 7 commits · +103 −76 2022-12: 7 commits · +247 −167 2023-01: 8 commits · +37 −36 2023-02: 1 commit · +6 −6 2023-03: 6 commits · +295 −234 2023-04: 0 commits · +0 −0 2023-05: 2 commits · +2 −4 2023-06: 7 commits · +34 −25 2023-07: 0 commits · +0 −0 2023-08: 1 commit · +5 −4 2023-09: 3 commits · +36 −35 2023-10: 0 commits · +0 −0 2023-11: 0 commits · +0 −0 2023-12: 1 commit · +10 −6 2024-01: 1 commit · +31 −31 2024-02: 2 commits · +22 −16 2024-03: 7 commits · +160 −163 2024-04: 0 commits · +0 −0 2024-05: 0 commits · +0 −0 2024-06: 3 commits · +5 −5 2024-07: 2 commits · +5 −1 2024-08: 2 commits · +0 −11 2024-09: 2 commits · +5 −3 2024-10: 2 commits · +1 −16 2024-11: 0 commits · +0 −0 2024-12: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-01: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-02: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-03: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-04: 2 commits · +4 −4 2025-05: 1 commit · +8 −4 2025-06: 2 commits · +76 −348 2025-07: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-08: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-09: 1 commit · +1 −0 2025-10: 0 commits · +0 −0 2025-11: 4 commits · +12 −12 2025-12: 0 commits · +0 −0 2026-01: 1 commit · +11 −7 2026-02: 6 commits · +90 −78 2026-03: 0 commits · +0 −0 2026-04: 0 commits · +0 −0

sources

  1. lore.kernel.org

    Recent upstream patch touching 13 DRBD files in April 2026 shows active maintenance rather than abandonment.

  2. lore.kernel.org

    Large March 2026 DRBD core rework for DRBD 9 transport and multi-peer support indicates ongoing feature work.

  3. linbit.com

    Vendor describes DRBD as actively developed replicated block storage software, implemented as a kernel driver and used for HA/software-defined storage.

  4. linbit.com

    Vendor download page lists current DRBD 9.x releases in 2026, indicating ongoing shipping and real-world supported deployments.

codex reasoning notes (technical)

This is a real kernel block driver, but it is software-defined replication rather than hardware-specific silicon; therefore hardware-obsolescence signals do not apply and `hardware_still_sold_new_in_2025` is false with no meaningful 'last widely available year'. `lore_file_timeline` on `drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c` returned the two lore URLs above, showing fresh 2026 upstream work including substantial refactoring. Web `search_query` returned the LINBIT product and download pages, showing DRBD is still marketed, released, and deployed for HA/cloud clusters. A local `git log --since=5 years ago -- drivers/block/drbd | rg -i 'remove|deprecat|obsolete'` found no removal-themed history. No in-tree replacement driver covers the same replicated-block-device use case, so removal/deprecation is not justified.